Skip to main content

The goal is to have a universal unconditional minimum income support that is not stratified based on complexion. When the Medicaid and the NHS first began service, some Hexadecaroon hoped to see only people with certain complexions get the full benefit of the government provision and should it not be that way if they are white? Click here.


The goal is to have a universal unconditional minimum income support that is not stratified based on complexion. When the Medicaid and the NHS first began service, some Hexadecaroon hoped to see only  people with certain complexions get the full benefit of the government provision and should it not be that
way if they are white?  But, the Medicaid,  NHS and universal minimum income support are public forums.  They are not private forums for private agendas.  We have an Economic Leviticus and a Biological Leviticus.  If someone tells you to put drinking water through water treatment, you will either agree or disagree while the purpose of the water treatment is to prevent communicable diseases that may cause your population to die off.  Would someone say he would prefer not to treat the water so that he can see his independence?  Someone tells you it is raining outside and offers you technology such as an umbrella to cover you from the rain. Would someone say he would prefer not to take the umbrella so that he can see  his independence? The UDHR with the UN ILO Recommendations R202 amount collectively  to an Economic Leviticus.  It is to cover you and protect you.  Much of what we feel in current politics is a decision not to follow policies or use technology that helps the population, the country and every citizen.    I 

 Joe Biden can be president. Will it be 2020, 2024 or 2028? He is experienced. These are some of the issues with which government is concerned.    As Canada has an obligation to the UN ILO Recommendations R202 and the OHCHR,  Ontario has an obligation.    Did you know English is an ethnicity just as French is an ethnicity? Is your constitution, somehow,enshrined by an ulterior motivation being expressed subconsciously? Maybe there is a systemic interruption to have a conversation, to get your attention. Resisting the UDHR is death. A fish resisting water is death. Resistance is death.   Could you write about US Code 18 Genocide and the conditions of life guaranteed and ensured by the U.S. Government commitment to the UDHR Article 25..in America ?   You can; of course.  It was written by the United States.    The year is almost 2020.  What is the cost of wasting fuel? What is the cost of wasting people in whom you have invested?   The real truth is that economies that do not participate in the UDHR with the universal minimum income support are considered primitive, backward and dependent on economies that do comply.     Could cuts to education be logical in an era of on going automation?  Students still need to have enough cumulative education to understand a vehicle lease agreement or a home purchase agreement.  This takes real education.  Laptops and smartphones are educative tools but they are not substitutes for the requisite teacher student  education.   The funding to education is to stay consistent and with the right intention, this means there are enough teachers per student pursuant  to the legislation that is subject to UN guidelines.   The UDHR is the law and the Secretary of State for every nation is now also the UDHR compliance Officer to ensure his or her signatory nation is UDHR compliant pursuant to the OHCHR and the UN ILO Recommendations R202.     The real truth is that at $73.97 per day per citizen to ensure and guarantee the functioning of your economy and also avoid the charges of intent to commit genocide contrary to domestic criminal law in the UK, Canada, the United States and Mexico, who would hesitate  to fulfil the existing legal requirements under the UDHR, the OHCHR and the UN ILO Regulations R202?  Compliance is also more logical than hoping or relying on pockets of citizens from compliant member nations such as China and Pakistan or India to prop up your economy with the economic activity  and product sales stoked by the minimum income support monies their Chinese, Indian or Pakistani government may provide them as they live, eat and buy products as temporary residents or permanent residency applicants in North America.  Advocating a delay to the fulfilment of the current legal requisites involving the universal minimum income support affecting the North American citizens or an under fulfilment at amounts less than $73.00 per day is a genocide offence as it advocates conditions of life that do not ensure and that do not guarantee the defined standards of life outlined in the UDHR and the OHCHR.  In other words, advocating $12000.00 per year is a crime. Advocating a delay to a universal minimum income support until the year 2020 is a crime. Providing the funds only to certain denominations such as the Puritans or the Jehovah Witness congregation is a crime against the targeted Non Jehovah Witness population. It is a crime.  The foreign populations are welcome as they come with the cultural caravans as they can still share and help North America to get their economy going again but relying on  small pockets of Asian  people who have no nexus to the absolute security of the North American continent while your population is illegally under funded is the economic misfeassnce leading to a dependence on foreign peoples.  This is not mentioning the evident misfeassnce in relying on foreign debt when a balanced respecting the dignity of its own people's will generate a surplus.  Let me call a Black Japanese person to see if he can explain it to you in English. Don't feel bad about The Anglo and criticise every little thing the Anglo may do but maybe ban the track suit as you normalize the Hijab.  The former mayor of Toronato pointed out that what is happening is not only genocide but misfeassnce in public office. He was drugged up, poisoned and killed by who inherited his office.  You are extending the reach  and influence of the Asian economy in the frustration of your own. It is evident to me that out of self respect, you see lots of Asian vehicles and Asian people in Asia and you see lots of Asian vehicles and Asian people in North America.   Do you see lots of -----people in------?  You see some and you may see more since there is a financial drain, instead of a brain drain, pulling people out of the economic illegality  and illogic of North America.   Click here for more      Please review the following:    .318 of the Criminal Code of Canada prevents Genocide.    318 (1) Every one who advocates or promotes genocide is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.  Marginal note:Definition of genocide  (2) In this section, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part any identifiable group, namely,  (a) killing members of the group; or  (b) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction.  Marginal note:Consent  (3) No proceeding for an offence under this section shall be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General.  Marginal note:Definition of identifiable group  (4) In this section, identifiable group means any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability.   R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 318;      2004, c. 14, s. 1;      2014, c. 31, s. 12;      2017, c. 13, s. 3.  __________________      United Kingdom    The relevant provisions on crimes against humanity under United Kingdom law are contained in the International Criminal Court Act 2001, c. 17, http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/pdf/uk pga_20010017_en.pdfhttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/pdf/uk pga_20010017_en.pdf.  This is the original, as published version and does not take into account any amendments that may have occurred.  Explanatory notes to this Act are also available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/ acts2001/en/ukpgaen_20010017_en_1 (last visited Apr. 29, 2010).  This section provides that the jurisdiction contained in that Act for the offenses of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes applies to acts committed in England or Wales and to those outside the UK by a UK national, resident, or person subject to UK service jurisdiction (which is defined later in section 67).    Northern Ireland is also included in the scope of the Act’s jurisdiction by virtue of section 58.    Scotland has separate legislation—the International Criminal Court (Scotland) Act 2001, ASP [Act of Scottish Parliament] 13, available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/ scotland/acts2001/ asp_20010013_en_2#pt1-pb1-l1g1.  The jurisdiction applies to acts committed in Scotland or outside the UK by a UK national or resident.          ___________________________________  The United States of America  __________________________    18 U.S. Code § 1091.Genocide U.S. Code Notes Table of Popular Names prev | next  (a)Basic Offense.—Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—  (1)  kills members of that group;  (2)  causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;  (3)  causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;  (4)  subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;  (5)  imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or  (6)  transfers by force children of the group to another group;  shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).  (b)Punishment for Basic Offense.—The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is—  (1)  in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and  (2)  a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.  (c)Incitement Offense.—  Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.  (d)Attempt and Conspiracy.—  Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.  (e)Jurisdiction.—There is jurisdiction over the offenses described in subsections (a), (c), and (d) if—  (1)  the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or  (2)regardless of where the offense is committed, the alleged offender is—  (A)  a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));  (B)  an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));  (C)  a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or  (D)  present in the United States.  (f)Nonapplicability of Certain Limitations.—  Notwithstanding section 3282, in the case of an offense under this section, an indictment may be found, or information instituted, at any time without limitation.  (Added Pub. L. 100–606, Ludwig's imitation of Versailles in Germany is an honourable  construction in imitation.    § 2(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3045; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60003(a)(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(a)(4), (b)(7), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1806, 1808; Pub. L. 110–151, § 2, Dec. 21, 2007, 121 Stat. 1821; Pub. L. 111–122, § 3(a), Dec. 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 3481.)  18 U.S. Code § 1093.Definitions U.S. Code Notes Table of Popular Names prev next  As used in this chapter—  (1)  the term “children” means the plural and means individuals who have not attained the age of eighteen years;  (2)  the term “ethnic group” means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of common cultural traditions or heritage;  (3)  the term “incites” means urges another to engage imminently in conduct in circumstances under which there is a substantial likelihood of imminently causing such conduct;  (4)  the term “members” means the plural;  (5)  the term “national group” means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of nationality or national origins;  (6)  the term “racial group” means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of physical characteristics or biological descent;  (7)  the term “religious group” means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of common religious creed, beliefs, doctrines, practices, or rituals; and  (8)  the term “substantial part” means a part of a group of such numerical significance that the destruction or loss of that part would cause the destruction of the group as a viable entity within the nation of which such group is a part.  (Added Pub. L. 100–606, § 2(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3046.)  Effect of international treaties[edit]  The UN Charters are Self-executing and do not require further domestic legislation to be enforced in the United States.  The absence of Basic income is a crime against US citizens and is enforceable under US domestic law. Foster v. Neilson, 27 U.S. 253, 314-15 (1829) U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Justice Marshall writing: "Our constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature, whenever it operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, when either of the parties engages to perform a particular act, the treaty addresses itself to the political, not the judicial department, and the legislature must execute the contract before it can become a rule for the Court." at 314, cited in Martin International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law et al.    In the context of human rights and treaties that recognize or create individual rights, U.S. constitutional law makes a distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaties. Non-self-executing treaties, which ascribe rights that under the constitution may be assigned by law, require legislative action to execute the contract (treaty) before it becomes a part of domestic law.[50] There are also cases that explicitly require legislative approval according to the Constitution, such as cases that could commit the U.S. to declare war or appropriate funds.  Treaties regarding human rights, which create a duty to refrain from acting in a particular manner or confer specific rights, are generally held to be self-executing, requiring no further legislative action. In cases where legislative bodies refuse to recognize otherwise self-executing treaties by declaring them to be non-self-executing in an act of legislative non-recognition, constitutional scholars argue that such acts violate the separation of powers—in cases of controversy, the judiciary, not Congress, has the authority under Article III to apply treaty law to cases before the court. This is a key provision in cases where the Congress declares a human rights treaty to be non-self-executing, for example, by contending it does not add anything to human rights under U.S. domestic law. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is one such case, which, while ratified after more than two decades of inaction, was done so with reservations, understandings, and declarations.[51]  Under the principle of pacta sunt servanda a country may not invoke provisions of its domestic laws or constitution as justification for failure to comply with its international law obligations. Therefore, if a human rights treaty has been ratified by the U.S. but is not considered self-executing, or has not yet been implemented by legislation, it is nonetheless binding on the U.S. government as a matter of international law.      War on Terror[edit]   Main article: War on Terror    In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the U.S. Government adopted several new measures in the classification and treatment of prisoners captured in the War on Terror, including applying the status of unlawful combatant to some prisoners, conducting extraordinary renditions, and using torture ("enhanced interrogation techniques"). Human Rights Watch and others described the measures as being illegal under the Geneva Conventions.[84]    Command responsibility[edit]       A presidential memorandum of February 7, 2002, authorized U.S. interrogators of prisoners captured during the War in Afghanistan to deny the prisoners basic protections required by the Geneva Conventions, and thus according to Jordan J. Paust, professor of law and formerly a member of the faculty of the Judge Advocate General's School, "necessarily authorized and ordered violations of the Geneva Conventions, which are war crimes."[85] Based on the president's memorandum, U.S. personnel carried out cruel and inhumane treatment on captured enemy fighters,[86] which necessarily means that the president's memorandum was a plan to violate the Geneva Convention, and such a plan constitutes a war crime under the Geneva Conventions, according to Professor Paust.[87]  This research is provided by  Angel Ronan Lex Scripta(TM).

Please review the following:

.318 of the Criminal Code of Canada prevents Genocide.

  • 318 (1) Every one who advocates or promotes genocide is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
  • Marginal note:Definition of genocide
    (2) In this section, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part any identifiable group, namely,
    • (a) killing members of the group; or
    • (b) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction.
  • Marginal note:Consent
    (3) No proceeding for an offence under this section shall be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General.
  • Marginal note:Definition of identifiable group
    (4) In this section, identifiable group means any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability.
  • R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 318;
    •        
  •  2004, c. 14, s. 1;
    •        
  •  2014, c. 31, s. 12;
    •        
  •  2017, c. 13, s. 3.
 __________________


United Kingdom

The relevant provisions on crimes against humanity under United Kingdom law are contained in the International Criminal Court Act 2001, c. 17, http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/pdf/uk pga_20010017_en.pdfhttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/pdf/uk pga_20010017_en.pdf.  This is the original, as published version and does not take into account any amendments that may have occurred.  Explanatory notes to this Act are also available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/ acts2001/en/ukpgaen_20010017_en_1 (last visited Apr. 29, 2010).  This section provides that the jurisdiction contained in that Act for the offenses of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes applies to acts committed in England or Wales and to those outside the UK by a UK national, resident, or person subject to UK service jurisdiction (which is defined later in section 67).

Northern Ireland is also included in the scope of the Act’s jurisdiction by virtue of section 58.

Scotland has separate legislation—the International Criminal Court (Scotland) Act 2001, ASP [Act of Scottish Parliament] 13, available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/ scotland/acts2001/ asp_20010013_en_2#pt1-pb1-l1g1.  The jurisdiction applies to acts committed in Scotland or outside the UK by a UK national or resident.




___________________________________
The United States of America
__________________________

18 U.S. Code § 1091.Genocide

prev | next
(a)Basic Offense.—Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—
(1)
kills members of that group;
(2)
causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;
(3)
causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4)
subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;
(5)
imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or
(6)
transfers by force children of the group to another group;
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(b)Punishment for Basic Offense.—The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is—
(1)
in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and
(2)
a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.
(c)Incitement Offense.—
Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(d)Attempt and Conspiracy.—
Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.
(e)Jurisdiction.—There is jurisdiction over the offenses described in subsections (a), (c), and (d) if—
(1)
the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or
(2)regardless of where the offense is committed, the alleged offender is—
(A)
a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(B)
an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(C)
a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or
(D)
present in the United States.
(f)Nonapplicability of Certain Limitations.—
Notwithstanding section 3282, in the case of an offense under this section, an indictment may be found, or information instituted, at any time without limitation.
(Added Pub. L. 100–606, § 2(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3045; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60003(a)(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(a)(4), (b)(7), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1806, 1808; Pub. L. 110–151, § 2, Dec. 21, 2007, 121 Stat. 1821; Pub. L. 111–122, § 3(a), Dec. 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 3481.)

18 U.S. Code § 1093.Definitions

prev next
As used in this chapter—
(1)
the term “children” means the plural and means individuals who have not attained the age of eighteen years;
(2)
the term “ethnic group” means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of common cultural traditions or heritage;
(3)
the term “incites” means urges another to engage imminently in conduct in circumstances under which there is a substantial likelihood of imminently causing such conduct;
(4)
the term “members” means the plural;
(5)
the term “national group” means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of nationality or national origins;
(6)
the term “racial group” means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of physical characteristics or biological descent;
(7)
the term “religious group” means a set of individuals whose identity as such is distinctive in terms of common religious creed, beliefs, doctrines, practices, or rituals; and
(8)
the term “substantial part” means a part of a group of such numerical significance that the destruction or loss of that part would cause the destruction of the group as a viable entity within the nation of which such group is a part.
(Added Pub. L. 100–606, § 2(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3046.)

Effect of international treaties[edit]  The UN Charters are Self-executing and do not require further domestic legislation to be enforced in the United States.  The absence of Basic income is a crime against US citizens and is enforceable under US domestic law.

Foster v. Neilson, 27 U.S. 253, 314-15 (1829) U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Justice Marshall writing: "Our constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature, whenever it operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, when either of the parties engages to perform a particular act, the treaty addresses itself to the political, not the judicial department, and the legislature must execute the contract before it can become a rule for the Court." at 314, cited in Martin International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law et al. 


In the context of human rights and treaties that recognize or create individual rights, U.S. constitutional law makes a distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaties. Non-self-executing treaties, which ascribe rights that under the constitution may be assigned by law, require legislative action to execute the contract (treaty) before it becomes a part of domestic law.[50] There are also cases that explicitly require legislative approval according to the Constitution, such as cases that could commit the U.S. to declare war or appropriate funds.
Treaties regarding human rights, which create a duty to refrain from acting in a particular manner or confer specific rights, are generally held to be self-executing, requiring no further legislative action. In cases where legislative bodies refuse to recognize otherwise self-executing treaties by declaring them to be non-self-executing in an act of legislative non-recognition, constitutional scholars argue that such acts violate the separation of powers—in cases of controversy, the judiciary, not Congress, has the authority under Article III to apply treaty law to cases before the court. This is a key provision in cases where the Congress declares a human rights treaty to be non-self-executing, for example, by contending it does not add anything to human rights under U.S. domestic law. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is one such case, which, while ratified after more than two decades of inaction, was done so with reservations, understandings, and declarations.[51]
Under the principle of pacta sunt servanda a country may not invoke provisions of its domestic laws or constitution as justification for failure to comply with its international law obligations. Therefore, if a human rights treaty has been ratified by the U.S. but is not considered self-executing, or has not yet been implemented by legislation, it is nonetheless binding on the U.S. government as a matter of international law.


War on Terror[edit]


Main article: War on Terror

In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the U.S. Government adopted several new measures in the classification and treatment of prisoners captured in the War on Terror, including applying the status of unlawful combatant to some prisoners, conducting extraordinary renditions, and using torture ("enhanced interrogation techniques"). Human Rights Watch and others described the measures as being illegal under the Geneva Conventions.[84]

Command responsibility[edit]




A presidential memorandum of February 7, 2002, authorized U.S. interrogators of prisoners captured during the War in Afghanistan to deny the prisoners basic protections required by the Geneva Conventions, and thus according to Jordan J. Paust, professor of law and formerly a member of the faculty of the Judge Advocate General's School, "necessarily authorized and ordered violations of the Geneva Conventions, which are war crimes."[85] Based on the president's memorandum, U.S. personnel carried out cruel and inhumane treatment on captured enemy fighters,[86] which necessarily means that the president's memorandum was a plan to violate the Geneva Convention, and such a plan constitutes a war crime under the Geneva Conventions, according to Professor Paust.[87]
This research is provided by  Angel Ronan Lex Scripta(TM).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We have the socioeconomic equation and solution to robotic automation with more money on the demand side of the equation to balance out the infinite supply. My ancestors were amerindian, white and white amerindian a generation ago. Now, we need a solution to mass socioeconomic indifference. We have a solution. It We are just Netflix directors here: You are reading a movie plot. Life imitates art. The current trumpeter as a regular citizen could not deal with his own logical indifference and diffidence if seen in another music business president and would criticise him like a bar room brawler, like the school football coach who graduated from trash talk but they lose every game. At the Department of the Interior, why do I have to deal with it? You had our team on the goal line but you told the Quarterback to throw the economy with a 0% sales tax in the other direction and to then take a selfie picture right there on the field. Then, you ask if you are accepted, that you need to be accepted. The answer is...nothing peronsal. It is just that I...you understand that America is a business. The majority of her functioning is now based on consumers who,for market viability in a world of automation are paid to consume because we know what the pirate cannibal terrorist has said he will do to show us how he is intelligent, how he robs and cannibalises to survive in America. We know this. I have the data of home invasion and murder rates going up during each wave of automation right here. But, if the condition of the world was the other president's fault, then it is now your fault based on your way of promoting yourself. The game has changed. There is a solution. But, we can't see you paving all the roads on your own or turning on post office lights and sanitizing all the water. We will implement the unconditional universal minimum income support for you.** It's a residual government obligation.** Justice Gainsborough confirms. The woman though who said the man from Ireland who showed up as a new colonist and that flew through her window was not really female. The man was a farm boy who wanted a family but could not see these people for what they are in the woods hiding under trees. But, they were impressive. Take that dark Jedi boy with you and get the f-'-k out. We will help Pennies Cochise; son of.. son of Dillinger with his mask on one side and son of Jesse James with his mask on the other. Pennies Cochise, as a blue collar preacher man, finally understands the equation to mass industrial robotics and the solution that is to give people the unconditional universal minimum income support. What is the point of having a farm if there is no safe market for the sale of your goods? What is the point if you dont know soil from sand? The farm and the market is dead..because of you!!!!! You let Barney Standoff out of jail and he has no further need of your services. He is grocery store owner in a good location. He needs safe markets, safe consumers . You f+;+ked up. You don't understand. Omega Man is your last hand Mitchum Rolo. The disruptive nature of deliberate terrorist actions such as the ***** ** "Omega Man"***** **hoax to create financial market chaos for various persons to achieve personal gain is the Black Monday. There will always be pirates and racketeering as well as terrorists but all three merging in one human being to achieve total global chaos and total personal AUTHORITY does not happen terribly often. There are laws written against this by ..white people. There are universal unconditional minimum income support legal solutions to automation written by English, French, Jamaican, American, Dutch, Irish, Mexican people. There are indictments pending. We see who profited. There are 4th and 5th dimensions of tv shows with very bad language being written and the Young Turk conspirators who don't know a functional fertile lacuna on a woman from a brick wall if they saw one are only asking who will sue them but they don't own any company that is now suffering in the fabricated chaos. What about arresting them? Dont worry about the black guy. He has never legislated any uh...law. His uncle did. He is white. But, he never really met him. The disruptive nature of the robotic automation technology that removes the usual ways and means of earning an income to fulfil the self interest hierarchy of Maslow's hierarchy of needs says peace is a problem when the pirate and cannibal may have other agendas and predelictions above the peaceful satisfaction of human need if they could resolve it. But,we always have pirates; maybe cannibals too while the universal unconditional minimum income support is the solution to the disruptive robotic automation technology known simply as automation. You say 'You don't really know what you want." By that response you former tolerated anthropological curiosity, there is not one soul targeting Nuevo Neoyorquino but you. I put you in this world and I can take you out; a white man saying I learned once from a 35 cent Western. You want me to come and do it for you, tuck you in. Complete the equation with you, play a game. I will tell you to smoke 10 packs of nicotine a day and you would do it. I tell you to implement the universal minimum income support and you don't...don't do What I say. So, let's play a game. It will be to confuse you and wipe you out again, wearing the uniforms we design for you again in Germany and France. But, I would prefer that you settle down and have life, money and family, life more abundantly. I would have it that you choose life; my dropping. Sit down; roll over. The whole world is watching. I said go to the bowl and eat and ensure every one has enough food in their bowl and bank accounts every month. It is called the universal unconditional minimum income support. What if you were a car manufacturer that needed to be accepted, that is succeed in the league of car manufacturers? What if you were a black student that needed to be accepted and succeed in not being held back to repeat a year? Presuming there are some rules that protect against business interference and guarantee healthy, fair markets and guarantee competition instead of monopolies as well as the fair objective marking scheme for the student, you should know what you need to do and it takes some agreement on your part; d'accord? But, maybe you enjoy needing to be accepted, the emotion and personal work involved. God has nothing to do with it. You know how hard you work in not liking yourself. "He needed to be accepted" is all he asked for the military to write on the bombs to be dropped to poison the world. The man reasons that he has enough people with whom he can breed new people to populate the earth; mixed race people that carry his dna. When it came to the minimum income support that was evidently virally necessary to cure the economic pandemic during the emerging gap between tremendous, robotic supply and depleted demand he said, "I don't know if I understand it yet." His dna has said this five times in Anglo North America beginning with the American revolution or Coup de le Serviteurs Contre La Propriété when it was also, as he said, "my time" to be the King and big. He failed at the 1861 juncture, leading to the civil war and he failed at the 1911 juncture leading to WW1. The failure continued, leading to WW2, culling and cooking America instead of bringing economic fulfilment. Let's play a game with you to confuse you. But, why would I? What do I really want as Roman Europe? How do I have what I want everywhere else except but in Anglo North America? But, if you don't understand that other people outside of yourself are not the source of acceptance and that acceptance comes from within, you will never achieve your goal of acceptance. It is a personal, inward decision that emanates outward through the whole, entire world and is an agreement with the world's maker and not the world's destroyer. It is a decision and there is only one solution; to decide and say you are accepted and not that you need to be accepted where deploying death and destroying the whole world is the only solution for your emotions. You would evidently also fail to understand that human beings agree or disagree with what you communicate; that you are accepted. Maybe they can see that someone is devaluing you, asking you to resign and leave now, that they can take the pictures better, do it better. Maybe they should call to run the Patrick Ronan franchise. Patrick Ronan ™ is a new trademark at Angel Ronan Consulting. There will always be a devil to project his disdain and devaluation on anyone he can so you can destroy yourself or the world, turning yourself into his minion. Now, if you are the mixed race progenitor of a new world, hoping for acceptance from your own mixed race world when the world is already moved race, do you understand that your mixed race progeny will be carrying a temperament that says they "need" to be accepted instead of that they "are" accepted. You will only compound your problem. - . -Cultures are spiritual clothing. You need a culture that envelopes and shields you when there are many who will try and break you down and remove your esteem, devalue you your soul to make them feel bigger,more special. Try Egypt, Rome, China and Japan for example. These are old umbrella cultures with many offshoots in the modern world. Greek helps also. Try a cartoon and the end result cannot be that you do not understand Maslow's hierarchy of needs which, today, begins with money as the principle need in an automated 21st century economy that is provided automatically by every world nation to its citizens nearly a 1/4 century into the 21st century. Write your slogans as sayings in a book. Buy a tartan or an old whiskey brand and maybe turn the bottle into a decoration. When grandad finishes his whiskey bottle, keep it. Save cash. Maybe keep a coca cola can. - When do you decide the monarch is on the cash and not the rebel? You have a participatory expenditure everyday in the government operation yet you need revenue and the key source is sales tax so now you also give participatory funding for each citizen when Alexa and the robots automated your lived experiences and took away the ways and means in your usual work experiences. Give thanks! Merci Le Monde. Why would he not manufacture a situation that involves infinite prosperity; safe and viable markets for the big manufacturers as the key political base and not the pirate cannibal? He must think the authority wants America to be dead. He wants America to be a viable, safe market and not a pirate paradise. Without a universal minimum income support, business will also be slow for the pirates and where will they go next? A pirate has joy. But his joy is stealing your joy, your life, liberty and pursuit of freedom and happiness. But why not let him do it if you don't understand an economy? The answer is because there is nothing left for the pirate to steal in his predilection to pirate goods,photos and some university essays or simple trademarks. You must think I wrote the laws to protect Angel Ronan who is only a student of the laws. Click here for more. I Will have all the money in this colony, these 13 colonies. I will have all the money in this church. I will have all the money in this franchise. We have to accept that, in spite of our best crime fighting efforts, there will always be the greedy Black Monday Terrorist pirate conspirators among us. This just in; "Operation Unsolved Equation." will be the first movie that will have its name changed as it has the word "Die" in it at this difficult time. *//**. I'm only joking. The world is dealing with a residual cannibal population that is running from technology and people who understand it before it would embrace the technological solution for maintaining viable markets and viable communities. We say cannibal because only a residual cannibal would manufacture a situation of desperation when he has the influence to do it only to take opportunity to cannibalize his neighbours. Why would he not manufacture a situation that involves infinite prosperity? A man who owns 30000 hotel rooms and 40000 condo/ hotel suites would rather stimulate the economy with the requisite universal unconditional minimum income support and earn more money on his tremendous inventory. Adding another 10000 rooms to the inventory when there is no business with everybody dead or staying home is pointless. There is no business. Hoping for foreigners to come and replace the dead White Americans is also pointless. I'm an African. I'm foreigner; right? I think we should help everybody as the law dictates. Some will just be consumers as guaranteed and some will also take on new skills such as sous chef, Sew machine mechanic or litigation clerk to add to their robotically automated life experiences. My life experience was automated by Alexa. I tell her to order the pizzas. We don't need more new foreigners but they are welcome to come along and take on our tradition. The universal unconditional minimum income support is here here for everyone. This America is a nation of immigrants; right but also a nation of 15th generation immigrants who don't intend on being displaced by new people everytime someone says they don't understand the disbursement( the universal unconditional minimum income support). There is now a question as old as the seeding of the American Revolution. Was it a tax tyranny or a disbursement( minimum income support) tyranny perpetrated by domestic Black Monday/ Boston Tea Party conspirators; not the English? The devil keeps asking you to join him in asking this question as old as the American revolution hmm? The question is "Who should live in America when how could these colonialists, these Americans live like Squires?" Who should come? But, if I get you to join me in asking an unnecessary question and if I ask it often enough, then I rule you and rudder you as a son of Columbus from St. Kitts because I need to have authority over you, devalue you. How can I devalue you and call you a fool without really saying it because it would not be politically correct and the bible says I should not call you a fool and I fear God although I just need to throw you overboard, do whatever I want to you as of Flotup 1993 ? Quelle est ca? Q' est que( coup d'etat) ce? There is an intention to the confusion; a subtle interruption to the evident solution and maybe just 400 years of delay and you still do not have water sanitation or the unconditional universal minimum income support. With it, you are fulfilled and viable. Without it, you need to be accepted and angrily in the fallout; not in fulfiment. The question is not who should come, that is what people should come to obfuscate the real problem innocently, the real problem with granted favor living in America to wallpaper the unsolved equation that has created a population deficiency; resulting in a market deficiency for the demand for goods. People need clean water and the disbursement. The question is who is the fool but the fool who follows this snake of childish usurpation and the photo of books was to prepare the bibliography for my essay book? This is dna; anthropology. Even I know how to solve the equation. I am a grade 8 dropout. Ellis Robert Rikkers Island is full and Norway is much more peaceful anyway and more prosperous with their commitment to the unconditional universal minimum income support. The cannibal fears social distancing , loss of acceptance or being excluded. The cannibal runs away to see if he can understand his need to be accepted. So why not maybe make the world more like him? Maybe use the technology against these law abiders until we all feel like the law breakers wearing masks; Jesse James masks who ate every Pinkerton he could. The issue in other jurisdictions is understanding. In others, it is hatred of select linguistic groups and cultures. After the cannibal runs away, he comes back and strengthens his numbers by getting people like himself out of prison to attack the law abiding and safe, community minded general population. The cannibal would rather bet on desperation to take property from others while the properties he has taken will remain empty until some leadership can restore order and implement the universal minimum income support. I will never watch another James Bond movie again unless it's on TV which is where I saw any James Bond for the first time. There is only one movie I plan to see in the theatre this year. Thank you. But, I wont say. It is entitled Poo Bear Power in the Toilet and Poo Bear poo powered Air Lines at the Space Station Concept Designed by a Black Dude. Why would he not manufacture a situation that involves infinite prosperity? He must think the authority wants America to be dead. He wants America to be a viable, safe market and not a pirate paradise. Without a universal minimum income support, business will also be slow for the pirates and where will they go next if there is no universal unconditional minimum income support ? We have to accept that, in spite of our best crime fighting efforts, there will always be the greedy Black Monday Terrorist pirate conspirators among us.

We have the socioeconomic equation and solution to robotic automation with more money on the demand side of the equation to balance out the infinite supply. My ancestors were amerindian,  white and white amerindian a generation ago.    Now, we need a solution to mass socioeconomic indifference.  We have a solution.   It We are just Netflix directors here:  You are reading a movie plot.   Life imitates art.  The current trumpeter as a regular citizen could not deal with his own logical indifference and diffidence if seen in another music business president and would criticise  him like a bar room brawler, like the school football coach who graduated from trash talk but they lose every game. At the Department of the Interior, why do I have to deal with it?   You had our team on the goal line but you told the Quarterback  to throw the economy with a 0% sales tax in the other direction and to then take a selfie picture r...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Cristobal Columbus have been the first Democratic politician when, in his imagination, he turned the position of being the heir to the kingdom into a contest when he thought he should be considered as a worthy candidate and that, he alone, was worthy as a ship captain explorer? But when he was not made king or little league baseball captain , he wanted to ask if it was because he did not work hard enough or if he was overlooked and then he wanted to see what the king looked like if maybe it was because Cristobal was not big enough; if it had something to do with appearance when his work was lauded and rewarded and should have been enough. In the end, his unchastened ego with insufficient schooling in anything other than his trade and the lack of chastising of character through social board games made him become a Cleptomaniac and a real pirate but not of chattel only but a Clepto of honor; any honor and any appreciation belonging to others. His daughter, the Marie Antoinette lookalike , is the honored Pallatine (Google Pallatine) who says she needs to be the only king, only authority and the only lawyer. It may be hard to believe but her son was asked what he was willing to give to be the King and he made an offer that brought his life to an end. This is the mystery of our faith. So, if you told him something that would improve a ship rudder, he would have said he wished he was a grade 12 trigonometry high school graduate and that he would have thought of the improvement himself. With your suggestion, you might end up dead and then he would put in a lookalike. But, politics has to involve some quality and genuineness instead of someone confirming with a game his ancestral mission by putting personal physical acceptance in a contest with his tangible observable policies and measurable compliance to domestic and international law on issues such as water quality, health policy, religious freedoms, and universal minimum income support from day to day. But, if you need attention as a modern day Fascist from Canada, you would challenge international law and domestic law. The Quebec vote banning religious symbols challenges Canadian national laws on the issue of religious tolerance. It is a Charter of Rights and Freedoms violation and a Human Rights violation. It will cost the country millions in tribunal judgements. Yet, Quebec honors domestic and international law concerning universal minimum income support; for all. Much of English Canada does not comply. The UDHR article 25 and OHCHR Article 11 is Rule of law and Rule of Law is not something you can pick and choose. Yet, now we are experiencing something completely different. The majority of North Americans do not enjoy or have the guranteed and ensured rights where the population in Quebec (all citizens of Quebec) and Vermont are exceptions. Is it a kind of protest? Instead of starving ourselves and our economy in protest, we can confirm our association and acceptance as citizens of the world. It is the law. It is also logical in the age of industrial automation and the robotification of labour. There really is only one issue going forward for all Americans socio-economically and that is a universal minimum income support while there is a lot of distraction causing the leader of a Free North America to tread water and defend himself all day before he could have a moment to stop bandaging his ego and just hear the trillion dollar foreign debt holders who want you to comply with a guranteed universal minimum income support for all North Americans regardless of complexion primarily for economic reasons since the machine does the work and the but you need the Burger and sushi loving American to buy the vehicle ideally although you could borrow people from Asia or from Iraq who already have an guranteed minimum income support. They would prefer that you honor the value of your own human life and read some Promises of God from Isaiah in Arabic as seen on the Koran or similar promises from the Buddha but pigs are raised to die; like North Americans. The irony is the etymology of North American food culture confirms this. The word "Maize" is an Amerindian word for "people." These Maize people confirmed their name as "Maize" to Cabot who met them in April of 1570 and who was mercifully eaten by them in October 1570 when Winter came and it was time to go south but they, the 12 Europeans, were very small people and it seems after praying for them, the Maize were at peace to eat them. The other option was to bury them and hope you endure and it is how others may have been helped who were willing to hear but who could not migrate south with them. Cabot did not hear. In fact, they had machines as Maize people to dig deep. They had technology and solutions that could help save lives in that cold North American environment. But, Cabot would not hear. This is what your leaders' reluctance to implement a universal minimum income support discloses. What do you think? Anyway, It is his job as Commander In Chief to hear what they, the foreign power, has to say about any person in the world the foreign power took time to address with a phone call since "foreign power" does not mean they are an enemy. It does not matter if they called during an election. He has a duty. They could be a fellow member of the United Nations. If a foreign government calls you as POTUS with information about political opponents, you would probably want the person to keep talking and hear everything. The FBI is immediately involved. The line is tapped. A call to the FBI is unnecessary and the White House with its Secret Service has its own investigative powers. You should hear Everything they have to say and of there is any value to the information, it will be determined. Maybe they called to say your opponent is a nice guy who is praying at the statue of Christ in Brazil or Poland! You don't call the FBI You call the Secret Service and they will log the matter and escalate to the Pentagon.

Could Cristobal Columbus have been the first Democratic politician when, in his imagination, he turned the position of being the heir to the kingdom into a contest when he thought he should be considered as a worthy candidate and that,  he alone, was worthy as a ship captain explorer?    But when he was not made king or little league baseball captain , he wanted to ask if it was because he did not work hard enough or if he was overlooked and then he wanted to see what the king looked like if maybe it was because Cristobal was not big enough; if it had something to do with appearance when his work was lauded and rewarded and should have been enough. In the end, his unchastened  ego with insufficient schooling in anything other than his trade and the lack of chastising  of character through social board  games made him become  a Cleptomaniac and a real pirate but not of chattel only but a Clepto of  honor; any honor and any appreciation belonging t...
Post a Comment
Read more